Eric Swalwell beats up faux GOP decision to take away him from the committee

House Republican resolution to remove Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) from Intel committee leaves out several FBI statements that did nothing wrong.

Here is the decision to remove Swalwell:

#FoxNews has received this resolution aimed at removing Congressman Eric Swalwell from the House Intelligence Committee. TBD on when Leader McCarthy will attempt to force a vote on the House Floor.

– Mike Emanuel @ (@MikeEmanuelFox) March 18, 2021

Rep. Swalwell noted that Minority Leader McCarthy’s resolution omitted Swalwell reporting the Chinese spy to the FBI and cooperating with the investigation:

Get to know the new McCarthyism. Several sentences in the resolution say: “Swalwell did not deny …”. However, they do not contain multiple “no wrongdoing” FBI statements and have done nothing other than “cooperate.” All of this to distract from @ GOPLeader’s support for QAnon.

– Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) March 18, 2021

Kevin McCarthy does nothing against QAnon Trump terrorists in his own caucus, but tries to remove Rep. Swalwell from a committee because Swalwell was an impeachment manager of the House and is suing Trump over the Capitol attack.

The resolution left out the fact that Swalwell did nothing wrong. He worked with the FBI on the investigation.

The stimulus bill is popular. Democrats are thriving in the pandemic and the economy, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) is a Russian asset, but Kevin McCarthy is trying to get Eric Swalwell off the intelligence committee.

For more discussions on this story, join our Rachel Maddow and MSNBC groups.

Follow and like PoliticusUSA on Facebook

Mr. Easley is the Founder / Senior Editor, White House Press Pool, and a Congressional Correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a bachelor’s degree in political science. His thesis focused on public order with a specialization in social reform movements.

Awards and professional memberships

Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and the American Political Science Association

Comments are closed.